This is my response to a lovely essay written by Marian at Different Thoughts, in which she responds to my last commentary on our discussion about drugs, enlightenment, and choices.
I tried keep this short enough to work as a ‘comment’, but I have obvious difficulty with brevity.
First, I felt a little bad after my last post, because my tone came on so strong. We all work hard to survive and grow, and for some reason I felt like I needed to vigorously defend my choices and my progress along my trail to enlightenment (which, as we both understand, is something we can only glimpse along the way, not a destination to be permanently found). But, it became all-too-clear to me later on later that my response came off sounding sarcastic in places. It is not my desire to judge, and certainly not to attack, another person’s choices or opinions.
That is my whole point: I believe no one can really say what is best for another person. Maybe the place we agree the most is in reacting to the arrogance of a mental health system that treats people like diagnoses rather than individuals and tells them what they ‘need’ on the basis of symptoms. Involuntary treatment stands as the most egregious example, of course. (Although in defense of psychiatry, society does demand that ‘something be done’ about people who are too disruptive. In that sense it is not ‘psychiatry’ that is at fault, it is our whole culture.)
My intent was not to inflict injury, and if I had that effect then I am very, very sorry. I have glimpsed the acrimony and judgement that crop up often when these topics are debated. This conflict gets exacerbated since we are each more or less hidden behind our computers and never see each other in person. I have felt discouraged by the whole situation, and I sometimes question whether to blog at all. I’ve definitely slowed down after my recent burst of enthusiasm (which mostly went unnoticed anyway). Gianna at Beyond Meds has signed off in response to such abusive treatment. I really do not want to be causing that kind of distress to anyone, no matter how much I agree or disagree.
I have had terrible experiences with therapy, by the way. Probably my neediness made me vulnerable (but isn’t that the point?), but without doubt a few of my therapists acted unethically in ways that damaged me. Not long ago I wrote a post that touched on these misadventures.
This discussion has been fun and instructive. Whether it seems like it or not, my attitudes have shifted; I am not convinced of your position, but you have moved me closer. I appreciate that you engaged me and sent a few visitors to my nascent blog in the process. I look forward to following your writing as time goes on. I also admire how you also blog in Danish, and thus widen your message. It would be a shame if the anger others direct at you makes you decide you to back out of the arena–though I certainly understand why you might need to do so for self-protection. I do hope it does not come to that, and I apologize again for any pain my comments caused you.
>> Share on Facebook>> Tweet
1
Gianna at http://bipolarblast.wordpress.com/
abuse is really NOT why I signed off…it may have been a catalyst, but more than the abuse was the hundreds of seekers of SUPPORT…lovely, wonderful, people, many of whom I had the pleasure of helping.
the thing is, now I need help and support. And it’s no longer enough to help others as it was for a long time. While I did get a ton of support from my readers, I also had to expend much too much energy in keeping up all that was created by that blog.
and so that’s the whole real story…the trolls and abusers really only being a small part of why I left and not the biggest part either. I simply need to rest…I am bedbound and wheelchair bound now after all and it’s from exhaustion.
I was working between 40 and 80 hours a week easily in that condition. THAT is insane. I need to take care of myself.
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 11:13am.
2
freda at http://YourWebsite
I just think you should continue your blog as long as there are readers and you wish to continue. There will always be some differences of views (spice of life?) and probably many stresses cause people to stop blogging – a buildup rather than a single trigger. On WIE the roots appear black against a cream background. Cheers. Freda
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 11:59am.
3
Will at http://willspirit.com
Sorry. I seem to jump to conclusions to readily. I misunderstood when you explained before. By all means, you must take care of yourself. Be well. I’ll keep in touch.
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 2:35pm.
4
Will at http://willspirit.com
Thank you Freda. So far there aren’t that many readers, actually. Currently I get 60-100 unique visitors/day, but the majority are probably automated. Of course, I only started the blog at May’s end, and have only really applied myself for two weeks. If I do it for 6-12 months and still have a light readership, I’ll rethink my activity. But right now I am patient. I would not be too bothered if someone attacked my position; it would be more upsetting to be ignored.
I appreciate the feedback on the ‘roots’ graphic. Just to clarify, then: is its background a different color than that of the whole page? I should just look like roots, not like a square with roots in it that stands out against the rest of the page. Thanks.
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 2:57pm.
5
Marian at http://diffthoughts.blogspot.com
Hi Will,
here’s another reply I wrote. Thank you, too, for the conversation. It had me think, and I like to think.
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 5:54pm.
6
Will at http://willspirit.com
Here is the little blurb I posted as a comment on your site: Now you are onto a new topic: the history and role of psychiatry. A full response to that issue will need to wait until another time. You won’t be surprised that I agree with parts, but also disagree with parts. Until the day when I get to this topic in more detail, however, let me state for the record that it’s quite a stretch to say the practice of psychiatry stands as a replacement for the inquisition! I obviously can’t dissuade you, but there are some weaknesses in the analogy (and you’re going beyond analogy to contend it’s serving the exact same purpose), to say the least.
Posted at July 19, 2009 on 8:50pm.
7
freda at http://YourWebsite
The background color of the roots is the same as the rest of the page – no square of a different color. Cheers Freda
Posted at July 22, 2009 on 6:54am.
8
Will at http://willspirit.com
Thank you. I put a lot of effort into trying to run a recent version of IE on my MAC without buying Windows, but failed. It turned out to be simpler to just ask for feedback. I may put up a brief survey soon to explore ideas for where to go with my blog. I appreciate your help and your readership.
Posted at July 22, 2009 on 7:04am.