This post is one in a string of essays about spirituality. It may make sense to start with the first entry in the series.
Whoops. I forgot that many people out there don’t need language to find ‘God.’ They feel its presence in their heart. I just returned from a Friends (Quaker) meeting, where several people reminded me of this basic truth. When in the company of someone who is spiritually centered, you don’t know it because they spin a good argument, you simply feel their love, acceptance, wisdom, and serenity: LAWS. Those are qualities to embrace. It humbled me, once again, to realize that my words are only words. They will not bring anyone to ‘God.’ My only hope is that my writing will help others knock down the barriers in their path toward peace.
A person at the meeting opened me to an interesting way to view ‘God.’ She told me someone once likened it to music: perhaps humans elaborate God much like they create melodies. Before people evolved, the potential for music existed, but the music itself did not. Songs and symphonies were beauty the universe contained in its future, but had not yet actualized. Before humans, it may well be that universal consciousness did not exist to the same extent as it does now. In that view, the availability of electrically responsive cells in highly structured matrices (i.e., brains) gave the spirit of the universe the tools it needed to achieve awareness. Before, there was presence. Now that presence may be aware, through us.
It’s just one way of looking at things, and I may be carrying the analogy beyond its original intent. But it strikes me as an interesting viewpoint.
Last night, in bed, I thought that our way of using cognition to understand ‘God’ is a bit like sailing. We are on a boat and feel the strong winds of reason. They seem to blow in only one direction, away from anything mystical. There appears to be only one compass point toward which to travel. However, with skill we can use the sails, keel, ballast, and rudder to make progress toward the source of the wind. We cannot move directly into it, but we can approach it obliquely. Reason can help us attain essential truths in just that way.
On the other hand, the heart can swim in the waters below the level of logical thought. Rather like a dolphin, it can reach the source in a more direct way.
If we use words, we are restricted to analogies. If we use feelings, we can get to ‘God’ without as much fuss. But the ego/rational mind balks at things it doesn’t understand. It tends to dismiss possibilities it either can’t see or can’t explain. I write to gently coax the ‘left brain’ into allowing the ‘right brain’ to do its thing. Perhaps if we persuade the rational mind that spirituality could be more than an illusion, it will allow the nonverbal mind greater freedom. Maybe it will step out of the way, and let us enjoy faith.
***Click here for the next entry in this series.

1
Gianna at http://YourWebsite
your post made me think of this:
“Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it.” – Rumi
peace to you Will.
Posted at December 6, 2009 on 3:01pm.
2
Will at http://willspirit.com
Yes, Gianna, that is a perfect quote. Whatever it is that’s come over me is about releasing barriers, not building trails. I am not qualified to lead anyone to ‘God,’ but I understand roadblocks. My rationality undermined the inspiration I received from my spiritual experiences in 2000. It has taken this long to find my way past all the ‘reasons’ my mind used to reject the possibility that our universe has a heart. Best wishes. Will
Posted at December 6, 2009 on 4:35pm.
3
Marian at http://diffthoughts.blogspot.com
I recently watched a movie – nothing to write home about, rather lousy – that lead my attention to the Gospel of Thomas, which I didn’t know existed. Amazing!
Posted at December 8, 2009 on 5:38pm.
4
Will at http://willspirit.com
Marian–
I once listened to a tape of Joseph Campbell talking about the Gospel of Thomas. I don’t remember much about it, but I do remember thinking Christianity would be improved if it were more widely known.
–Will
Posted at December 9, 2009 on 7:54am.
5
Marian at http://diffthoughts.blogspot.com
There isn’t much in it to create a cult of personality from. No personal life story or anything. What the church wanted when it constituted itself was power. So, it needed to “have” something that they could make people want to “have”: Jesus. Christianity would have developed a lot more into a philosophy like Buddhism and Taoism if it had been founded on texts like the Gospel of Thomas.
Posted at December 9, 2009 on 3:49pm.
6
Will at http://willspirit.com
Marian–
I wonder how differently western history would have played out if Christianity had developed like that. Maybe a lot. Maybe very little. Hard to say how much the behavior of Europeans reflected their dominant church, vs how much the church reflected the attitude of the race. (With 75% of my ancestors English, and 25% Dutch, I have standing to criticize this ethnic group.) Or maybe all the conquest, subjugation, and arrogance was just human nature.
–Will
Posted at December 12, 2009 on 3:49pm.