This post is one in a string of essays about spirituality. It may make sense to start with the first entry in the series.
I’m going to bullet-point the principles upon which I believe a realistic faith in ‘God’ can be constructed. Future posts will dissect the items one by one, so that they will make sense individually. Then I’ll put the whole list together in a final entry or two.
In a way, I need to apologize for this project. It serves me at least as much as anyone else. My entire being craves faith. My life has spun into directions I never anticipated or wanted. Who’d have ‘thunk’ that I would find myself at age fifty-one with no career? With damage to my body I can barely accept? With a string of psychiatric diagnoses, and perpetual severe mood swings? Life does not make sense to me right now, and I feel very far away from everyone around me, all those people I see working and living normal lives. If only there were some universal spirit that connected me to the rest of the human race. My material connections and my interpersonal contacts do not suffice to make me feel a part of things. I need something like ‘God.’
So the list below runs through my thinking out of necessity. Before working to build a more effective belief system, I had to ask whether the ‘higher power’ Alcoholics Anonymous directs everyone toward stands any chance of being real. Or is it just a comforting fantasy? I have spent too much of my life studying biology and physics to just toss all reason aside and embrace nonsense. Add to that all the suffering in the world. It intrudes in my own life, has devastated my family, wrecked the peace of many of my former patients, and floods the news. If there is a ‘God,’ it has to be one that takes the long view. It evidently sees individual humans as passing creatures who may be miraculous, but who must fend for themselves.
In order to build a belief in a higher power, I have focused on the truths below. It takes a bit of finesse, but with the proper perspective one can use these statements to bolster one’s search for a consciousness that connects us all. One can feel safe that one’s quest for a universal mind is neither deluded nor doomed. At the end of my string of discussions of the elements of my list, I’ll spend some time looking at the constraints science and reality put on this putative consciousness. I’ve already mentioned one: this entity leaves us mostly on our own in our struggle to survive. We may find moral support, but we cannot hope to discover a divine hand that moves hardship and tragedy out of our path.
The following facts act as keys that open my mind to faith, despite my materialist upbringing and skeptical nature:
- Faith works. Quite possibly, when people pray or ‘turn their lives over’ to a higher power they are really just setting their ego aside. The act of faith (and faith must be active to be effective) allows instinct, intuition, and deep parts of the mind to step into the fray. They are often more competent when it comes to making choices than the narrow, materialistic ego. But I also believe it is possible that these deeper strains of thought reach further, and connect with some kind of universal consciousness. More on that later.
- The experience of God is real. Even if there is nothing on earth besides matter and physical energy, people throughout history have seen, felt, and heard things that convinced them God exists. It is undeniably possible that these are just neurological phenomena, but they do occur. And they change lives. For instance, such ‘visions’ set me on a ten year quest that currently manifests as this series of blog entries that aim to open faith to resistant minds. (Note I am not trying to open minds to faith; that’s up to you.
- Serendipity happens. Anyone who is the slightest bit open to the possibility of significant coincidences knows this. Perhaps at some point I will list some of my own experiences. It would be even better if readers would leave theirs. I’d love to build a page out of the odd alignments of circumstances that so often arise at just the right moment. Of course, there is a pretty good possibility they mean nothing. One can take the stance that there is no spiritual force underlying these events, and they just happen out of pure and unaided chance. But it would be inaccurate to argue they do not occur.
- Consciousness has effects beyond the brain. This truth manifests at truly tiny scales, i.e., in the realm of quantum mechanics. But physical theory implicates conscious observation as having effects on matter/energy. Although the conclusion that this opens a door for mysticism is vehemently debated by materialists, the burden of proof lies with them. The theory itself does nothing to help atheists prove the absence of spiritual influences.
- All things are connected. The experimentally proven principle of ‘entanglement’ shows that particles that were once in close contact with one another continue to behave as if connected under certain circumstances. The influences are exerted instantaneously, and do not depend on transfer of energy. Since the entire universe arose from an entity much smaller than an atomic nucleus, this means everything is connected. Note how this sounds a lot like a basic tenet of many spiritual philosophies.
- Knowledge has limits. On small scales, there are limits to how accurately ‘reality’ can be seen. Beyond a certain precision, what is ‘real’ becomes fuzzy. Uncertainty forms the roots of the universe. Rigid beliefs are misguided, whether it is dogmatic faith or convinced atheism.
- Reality is stranger than we think. As just one example, time behaves strangely when things move fast, and our day-to-day experience of it is deceiving. Only our ego’s arrogance permits belief that we really understand our surroundings. The humble stance is to remain open to mystery.
- Life is a miracle. Some religions stand on miracles. These institutions turn to miracles for legitimacy. If miracles can support faith, then the fact that life exists may suffice. I do not suggest evolution was not driven by random events, nor do I postulate a conscious creator-God. But if we open our hearts to the vast mystery of creation, we are halfway to a spiritual sensibility.
Putting all these together, and also a few minor corollaries, gives me a sense that belief in a universal consciousness is not silly and misguided. It may be mistaken, but there are reasons to hope it is not. I’ll work my way through these reasons as I continue this theme in coming days.
***Click here for the next entry in this series.
>> Tweet

1
lostinamaze at http://inamaze.wordpress.com
I have been mulling over these posts for a bit. I consider myself a spiritual person but in the last few years have somewhat stepped away from my spirituality. I didn’t have to build a belief in God, it seems to have always been within me but I have tried to continue to build upon my belief system. I do wonder about spirituality vs religion. What is the difference and is there a point when spirituality becomes religion? Anyway, I have enjoyed reading about your perspectives and look forward to reading more.
Posted at December 13, 2009 on 11:24pm.
2
jss at http://jssfive.blogspot.com
“The experience of God is real. Even if there is nothing on earth besides matter and physical energy, people throughout history have seen, felt, and heard things that convinced them God exists. There is every likelihood that these are just neurological phenomena, but they do occur”
Just ‘neurological phenomena’? I think it highly presumptuous that God could not, would not choose to use neurological or for that matter any other biological phenomena as a means to make himself known to an individual. To reduce someone’s personal experience of a manifestation of God to ‘just neurological phenomena’ is to suggest that he would not operate within the physical laws of the universe which he himself set down. We in our rigid intellectualism always seem to insist that manifestations of God must be presented in our terms or rather in terms of what we think can be classified as miraculous. In doing so we miss a whole hell of a lot of good stuff. It is not at all hard for me to accept that the Red Sea was in fact parted and that the Jews most certainly crossed through it. And it is not at all hard for me to accept that this phenomena could easily be explained in scientific terms that appeal to our intellectual requirements. I would suggest that it is highly likely.
I actually posted thoughts in this direction some months back:
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-vs-supernatural.html
if you are interested.
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 8:10am.
3
Will at http://willspirit.com
jss–
I did not see your earlier posts. If you provide a link, I’d love to take a look. I actually don’t believe for a moment that ‘spiritual’ neurological phenomenal are without deeper significance. And yes, if there is any kind of divine presence, it no doubt speaks to us through the fabric of creation. At some point spiritual messages would have to find traction in the brain, even if they were broadcast over some mystical ether science has missed so far. But I don’t think there needs to be, or is likely to be, any such ether. I think ‘God’ communicates from the very depths of matter, as my spiritual series will eventually discuss.
Thank you for pointing out how the statement you quote sounds. I want to acknowledge the viewpoint of those who say: ‘oh well, Oliver Sacks talks about all kinds of weird things; religious experiences are just more examples.’ I want to make it clear I’m well aware of that objection. But I’m putting up a straw man. It’s one I plan to demolish later when I elaborate on each of these ‘cornerstones’ of my amateur philosophy. I will go back and change the wording to avoid sounding like I buy into the viewpoint that religious ecstasies are little more than seizures. I can’t deny it’s possible, but I don’t believe it.
By the way, and I will try to say this more than once as I go forward, I don’t claim that any of the concepts I present are novel. These are not new ideas, and I hope my words don’t make it sound like I’m taking credit for them. In bits and pieces I’ve come across most of it in other places. And the parts I think are mine are very likely to have been things I’ve either heard and forgotten that I did, or thought up on my own, but that were also thought of by others. All I’m trying to do is organize this information so that it can be found in one place. So that someone (me?) who wants to get past intellectual arguments to faith can find a series of facts to bolster their conviction that the universe must be more mysterious than the current flock of professional atheists (Dawkins, Hitchens) believe. Even my goal to put such arguments down in one place has been tried many times before, going back hundreds of years. I am just doing the same thing in my own (hopefully unique) way.
–Will
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 8:38am.
4
jss at http://jssfive.blogspot.com
Why wouldn’t you take credit for them? They’re your thoughts. If not you then who?
And I don’t see any need for you to change what you’ve said about neurological phenomena, or anything else for that matter. The truth is there are so many out there who buy into that (in my opinion) myopic view of spirituality and the interactions of God with human beings. I am not saying it is invalid I am merely pointing out how it might be flawed or used to dismiss farther-reaching possibilities.
I actually have been following your posts on spirituality and I find them very thoughtful and insightful. They are your thoughts, please don’t change them to satisfy somebody else.
By the way I did include a link to the post on my site that I was referring to. If you bother to look you will no doubt see many others that represent the ramblings of my feeble mind. What the hell. It may be feeble but at least it’s mine.
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 8:45am.
5
Will at http://willspirit.com
jss–
This is an altered version of a comment I posted a few minutes ago. I apologized for not seeing the link in your comment. I don’t know how I overlooked it. I read through the comment twice before I answered you, but it was in the small print of the ‘dashboard;’ maybe that explains my oversight, or maybe I should just blame it on ADD. Anyway, I just read your post. I completely agree with it, and could not have said it better. Using the Merton quotes made the post exceptionally readable, a technique I may borrow. As happened before, I find we fundamentally agree.
By the way, I appreciate the nudging to take credit for my thoughts. To invoke my childhood: I was raised to downplay everything I did, take credit for nothing, agree with everyone. You can see it in my writing today. I’d never make it on talk radio (or in the blogosphere, for that matter) because I am unable to be controversial. If anyone challenges me I usually see their point. But I should work on being a little less of a pushover.
Anyway, thanks for the great discussion. I would love to see more of your spiritual posts. I don’t see a way to search your blog (My own site is searchable, but only on my ‘tags’ which I doubt are very useful–a perennial problem with blogging is how the old posts get buried with time.) Would you mind leaving some links in a comment here?
–Will
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 9:33am.
6
jss at http://jssfive.blogspot.com
I’m sure you’re going to be sorry you asked but here you go. Truthfully all of my posts are bent some to the spiritual. To be sure some more than others but they mostly resonate with the ultimate questions that are on my mind.
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/12/every-year-my-husband-and-i-go-to-lunch.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-live.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/10/we-live.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/10/heres-question-if-i-dont-know-meaning.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/10/ruin-hath-taught-me-thus-to-ruminate.html#comments
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/10/i-have-to-admit.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/08/psalm-53-and-14-begin-as-follows-fool.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/08/caught-beyond-two-worlds.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/08/personal-god.html
http://jssfive.blogspot.com/2009/07/in-search-of-self.html
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 11:03am.
7
jss at http://jssfive.blogspot.com
Your site doesn’t appear to like my links. I’ve left you a post over at my place with the links.
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 11:11am.
8
Alison Rising at http://alisonrising.blogspot.com
Been too busy lately to participate in the discussion, but I wanted to say I’m really enjoying this last string of posts. And this post in particular really captures the spirit of the search for God. I have had some very similar thoughts and feelings…Thanks for posting!!!
Posted at December 14, 2009 on 5:35pm.
9
Will at http://willspirit.com
Alison–
I’m glad you like it. I am greatly helped by the validation. A few people I know in ‘real life’ have also been offering positive feedback about the spiritual lineup. So I feel good about continuing. My plan is to do another in the series tomorrow. Eventually, my plan is to edit and tighten the posts, and make the project a coherent whole.
Best wishes
–Will
Posted at December 15, 2009 on 9:12pm.
10
Will at http://willspirit.com
jss–
Thanks for the links. I will be reading them in short order.
–Will
ps–I just found your links. They got trapped by my spam filter. I’ve released them so that others can benefit also. I really enjoyed your thoughts, and left many comments as you’ve no doubt already seen. wjm
Posted at December 15, 2009 on 9:13pm.