My upbringing traumatized me, but I enjoyed a number of special times. In fact, when your parents don’t care about you and encourage you to stay away from home, you are more free than kids who are watched and protected. At age twelve a friend of mine and I started sailing each summer from Marina del Rey in Los Angeles to Catalina Island some thirty miles offshore. We’d go for two weeks each time, and scuba dive every day. Not many parents would have trusted two youngsters to independently do something so potentially hazardous, but both Mark and I were free.
A couple of times my dad flew in for a few days of scuba diving. I remember fondly those times with him and probably should give him more credit for showing me that attention. One of the most beautiful experiences of my life happened while he and I were diving together.
The underwater landscape around Catalina consists of amber colored kelp forests, which grow from reefs of rough rock that through the otherwise sandy sea bottom. The kelp fronds extend from their reef anchors up to the surface thirty feet above, and they weave a thick, floating mat on the rolling ocean surface. We had just exited one of these kelp stands and were swimming through open water toward another ‘grove’, when we found ourselves surrounded by a school of grunion. The grunion is a silver fish about six inches long, nondescript but with a cosmopolitan tendency to swim together in massive numbers. Thousands of animals schooled around us.
What struck me then, and even more now, was the incredible coordination of their movements. Although the fish could no doubt see each other and feel their collective vibrations in the water, the synchrony of their migration seemed far more precise than could be explained on those bases. The scene was astonishing. All the animals would turn together in what seemed like an instant, as if an invisible message had been transmitted, making the crowd of fish behave as one organism. The school divided and swam smoothly around us, never approaching closer than three or four feet, and always as organized as a phalanx of soldiers under strict parade command. But there was nothing martial in this spectacle. The water felt suffused with a deep intelligence, which we could barely fathom in our clumsy, bubbling gear.
These days, as I read about consciousness and its implications, I remember that experience. It particularly resonates with what Rupert Sheldrake has written about morphic fields. These postulated energies give schools of fish their unity, and also direct embryonic development and account for so-called psychic phenomena. Sheldrake marshals impressive data to demonstrate that standard physical models can’t explain the massively coordinated actions of thousands of fish in a school or billions of cells in a growing fetus. He also recounts the enormous amount of evidence that proves the reality of psychic abilities in humans.
These days, as I work to establish my life on sound principles, I look to that school of fish for lessons. Every action of myself and others can be seen, metaphorically, as a single fish. If each action were independent and occurred without reference to any larger organizing principle, then anxiety would be in order. Keeping a tight grip on my behavior would help ensure that none of the hundreds of ‘fish’ that make up my life swam out of line. But if there is morphic resonance (a similar concept, discussed by Elvin Laszlo, is the Akashic Field) keeping life synchronized, then letting go makes the greater sense. I could trust in the intelligence of these encompassing influences.
Sound familiar? In Alcoholics Anonymous a favorite saying is, “let go and let God.” The time has come for scientists to recognize that while the Judeo-Christian-Muslim concept of a patriarchal God is inaccurate and in many ways a personification of ego, there really is something ‘out there’ that makes life a meaningful and directed experience. I have commented many times on this blog about the role synchronicity has played in my life, especially recently. The strange coincidences can be explained as manifestations of morphic or Akashic influences. This isn’t necessarily ‘God’ in the traditional sense, but it is surely sacred.
>> Share on Facebook>> Tweet

1
Denise Douros (dldselfnarration) at http://dldselfnarration.wordpress.com/
I’ve often wondered the same thing, when watching, or better yet, swimming with schoals of sealife, Will. I agree with your conclusions on this – we can only scientifically dissect what causes this Syncronistic Swim as far as we can, given our brain’s capacity and given what we know about that!
It surely is Sacred and should be Respected… who do we think WE are… are we better, more knowing? If so, why do we live as we do with so many trying to inihilate one another and our good Earth, too boot?
Thanks Will, this is such an excellent topic, but I’m afraid it’s too early for This Brain! ~Denise
Posted at November 27, 2010 on 6:31am.
2
Will at http://willspirit.com
Denise–
Lately, as I find myself delving deeper into consciousness during meditation, I think more and more of the dolphins and whales. They have brains as large as humans. What is going on in those mysterious minds? Do they reach levels of awareness we can only dream of? I’m beginning to think so. Humans, with their monkey-bodies, have it all over the cetaceans when it comes to technology. But if the eastern thinkers, using only concentrated thought, derived a vision of reality indistinguishable in its essence from quantum mechanics, what have the dolphins accomplished in their eons beneath the surface? We are so horribly arrogant, and so woefully ignorant. A lethal combination.
Thanks for the comment.
–Will
Posted at November 28, 2010 on 7:14pm.
3
Lynn Dover at http://naturechange-lynn.blogspot.com/
Hi Will:
My officemate (a graduate student in mathematics) wrote on the topic of synchronistic movements. My memory of what she wrote is that it is possible to explain such synchronicity using the mathematics of differential equations. DE’s isn’t my field so I can’t give a full professional evaluation. However, in the superficial glance I gave it, it looked like solid work.
It was a couple of years back so it’ll take me a bit to get you a full reference.
Posted at December 5, 2010 on 5:23pm.
4
Will at http://willspirit.com
Lynn–
Sounds like an interesting article. Doubt that after so many years without keeping up my mathematics I’d be able to make much sense out of an argument based on differential equations (which were never my strong suit anyway), but I’d still be interested if you find it. I do believe that there is a unity between science and all the phenomena we observe. Certain formulations of science, however, are too narrow to allow this unification. Mathematics, in its purest poetic beauty, is of course open to anything that can be rigorously argued and so stands outside the prejudice of current (and in my opinion restrictive) mechanistic paradigms. Thanks for the comment.
–Will
Posted at December 6, 2010 on 8:30am.
5
jane-ellen at http://YourWebsite
Why “strange” modifying coincidences? I’m sure you are aware that statistics, and the human mind’s many times proven aptitude for forgetting failures of coincidence and latching on to examples, require such coincidences.
Posted at December 11, 2010 on 9:45am.
6
Will at http://willspirit.com
Jane-Ellen–
One can divide world views into two basic groups. On there one hand there is the Newtonian picture: all experience is traceable to matter (or by extension energy); there is no inherent direction or meaning in the cosmos; and everything is random. The opposite opinion is that the universe is not reducible to Newtonian mechanics, has both meaning and direction, and although random on some scales still manifests inherent organizing tendencies. This isn’t simply a question of atheism vs spiritualism. The problem can be framed in more modern terms, and in fact rather succinctly: do quantum mechanical behaviors have non-trivial influences on macroscopic events? There can be no question that at the smallest scales of reality Newtonian pseudo-random determinism breaks down. But does the strange behavior seen at atomic and subatomic scales have any manifestations in our day-to-day lives? If so, then all manner of truly strange (meaning directed) coincidental events are possible. Mind would have some influence over matter, and hence over the course of history. We would live in a universe that could, indeed, be considered spiritual, though in a scientific way. The jury is still out on this. If you want to read some works that very cogently challenge the Newtonian view, and present strong supporting evidence, start with Rupert Sheldrake’s, The Sense of Being Stared At and Other Powers of the Extended Mind. See if you can honestly dismiss the mountains of data he amasses that suggest traditional physical models are simply not sufficient to explain many mental phenomena. Then look at Quantum Aspects of Life, edited by Derek Abbot and Paul Davies. This text presents both the pro and con sides of the argument for significant quantum effects in macroscopic living systems. The jury is indeed still out. But contrary to the views presented by convinced atheists, the idea that Newtonian principles are insufficient to explain life is neither ruled out nor marginal. Very prominent scientists are beginning to state, quite openly, that the twentieth century’s mechanistic, materialistic philosophy was incomplete. So sure, any coincidence can be explained in two ways. Maybe dozens of coincidences can, even when they all seem to point to the same kind of directedness in the cosmos. But whether either explanation is the correct one must be determined on the basis of all the evidence at hand. After a great deal of reading about this subject, I think there is a pretty good chance that the universe is more interconnected and subtle than I was led to believe in college. Not all intelligent, scientifically trained people agree with this view, but many do.
–Will
Posted at December 11, 2010 on 9:46pm.