In physics, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle sets limits on knowledge. As a scientific law, its effects are seen only on the minute scale of subatomic particles. But I suspect it contains a deeper meaning that might help us relate to life in general.
The Uncertainty Principle states we can never accurately determine both the position and motion of a particle. The more we can say about an electron’s location, the less we can say about its velocity, and vice versa. As an analogy, imagine we’re tracking a red Ferrari in San Francisco. The Uncertainty Principle, if it had relevance at this scale, would say that if we know the car is currently in the middle of the Post and Hyde intersection, we can’t say how fast it’s going. It might be stopped; it might be racing at 110 mph. Or if we know it’s traveling exactly 62 mph, it could be anywhere in the city.
In ordinary life this species of uncertainty is negligible; the police can document where and how fast the Ferrari was moving when they pulled it over. But at atomic scales, the Uncertainty Principle limits our knowledge. This isn’t merely a problem of measurement failure; it’s a cosmic restriction on achievable precision. We can’t know details beyond a certain level of approximation. The consensus view is that electrons don’t move in a way that permits exact description. Matter exhibits fuzziness and randomness that cannot be resolved no matter how sophisticated our instrumentation.
In a reply to Dave’s comment on the last post, I stated:
More and more it seems to me that the path to higher consciousness demands we let go of certainty. No fixed beliefs can pass the gate… Yet something in the human mind insists on answers. Whether it’s belief in a God who listens or in a universe that doesn’t, we gravitate toward conclusions and feel uneasy when we can’t find them. But I suspect true mental presence requires that we give up our quest for certainty. We must rest in the not-knowing.
Not-knowing is a venerable practice in Eastern traditions. Ancient mystics understood there are questions that can never be answered. In this scientific era we’ve become accustomed to expecting truth to emerge upon investigation. We assume that if a phenomenon looks mysterious, time and research will eventually clarify the situation in causal and mechanistic terms. The conventional scientist understands that we don’t know everything, but he or she believes that everything is in principle knowable.
The Uncertainty Principle suggests otherwise. Even though it comes out of observations in cloud chambers and particle accelerators, I suspect it’s telling us something about the nature of ultimate reality: it’s beyond our ken. Not just in practical terms, but in absolute ones. Precise answers are not just difficult to find, they’re prohibited.
We should keep this in mind when we try to pin down spiritual truths. Maybe the reason the universe can look both sacred and heartless is that there is built-in paradox and obscuration. The more we identify with the material world the less we see of universal consciousness; the deeper we delve into meditative states, the more illusory the physical world appears. But the elusiveness of cosmic awareness and the haziness of matter are ever-present; they confront us when we push concepts too far in our search for final answers.
The point is: a universe that enforces uncertainty is a universe that promotes humility. The moment we become too sure of ourselves is the moment we risk disillusionment. Many people battle doubt by attaching ever more rigidly to convictions. Although faith plays a role in spiritual life, it can be misapplied to demand unquestioning belief of unprovable concepts. A better approach is to hold our views loosely. Since we are prohibited from finding ultimate truth, we might conclude the cosmos invites us to embrace not-knowing as the path to grace.
Imagine the discord that would simply dissolve if we all admitted we just can’t know.
>> Share on Facebook>> Tweet
